So the big news which blew away all the records of Apple Inc. Was About that Yearly profit per employee.Apple is far ahead of many big companies, including Google, Microsoft, Intel, Cisco, Yahoo, Oracle, IBM, Amazon, HP, and Dell, as chosen by Pingdom.
The inevitable conclusion based regarding Yearly Profit Per Employee was concluded by analytics firm Pingdom, sourced from Yahoo finance data.The survey analysed the profit per employee metric for several tech companies like Google, Intel, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard and others.
Below is the analysis of Yearly Profit Per Employee for year 2011 vs 2008
So Google were the leading company according to Yearly Profit Per Employee but Apple beat them up and lead the market share surprisingly.Apple crossed $151,063 profit per employee in 2008 to $419,528 per employee in the past 1 year only.So it pushed Apple to first place, taking the leadership away from Google.
So all these yearly profit per employee definitely depends on the number of employee any company is acquired of. Apple has 46,600 employees versus 89,000 for Microsoft and 26,316 for Google.See below
Yahoo has exactly the same number of employees now as in 2008, while Microsoft actually shrunk its operation by 2,000 employees. Meanwhile, HP’s and IBM’s profit per employee isn’t very high likely because of the significant overhead required to run such large companies.
It’s also worth taking a look at total employee numbers. Apple has added more than twice as many new employees as Google in the past couple of years, but still managed to pass the search giant.
Apple is, of course, the most profitable handset vendor of the three. The Cupertino team has managed to capture a whooping 55 percent of total profits and one fifth of total revenues during the first quarter based on shipments of just five percent of all of the handsets that had been sold during the quarter.
The inevitable conclusion based regarding Yearly Profit Per Employee was concluded by analytics firm Pingdom, sourced from Yahoo finance data.The survey analysed the profit per employee metric for several tech companies like Google, Intel, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard and others.
Below is the analysis of Yearly Profit Per Employee for year 2011 vs 2008
So Google were the leading company according to Yearly Profit Per Employee but Apple beat them up and lead the market share surprisingly.Apple crossed $151,063 profit per employee in 2008 to $419,528 per employee in the past 1 year only.So it pushed Apple to first place, taking the leadership away from Google.
In 2008, Google was leading this list, but now Apple has surpassed it by quite some margin. This isn’t because it’s not going well for Google, but rather because it’s going spectacular for Apple.thats so true because Apple’s profit per employee is 1.25 times that of Google’s and 1.71 times that of Microsoft’s, which is now in third place.
So all these yearly profit per employee definitely depends on the number of employee any company is acquired of. Apple has 46,600 employees versus 89,000 for Microsoft and 26,316 for Google.See below
Yahoo has exactly the same number of employees now as in 2008, while Microsoft actually shrunk its operation by 2,000 employees. Meanwhile, HP’s and IBM’s profit per employee isn’t very high likely because of the significant overhead required to run such large companies.
It’s also worth taking a look at total employee numbers. Apple has added more than twice as many new employees as Google in the past couple of years, but still managed to pass the search giant.
Apple is, of course, the most profitable handset vendor of the three. The Cupertino team has managed to capture a whooping 55 percent of total profits and one fifth of total revenues during the first quarter based on shipments of just five percent of all of the handsets that had been sold during the quarter.
No comments:
Post a Comment